Charged with Six Firearms Offences Whilst Serving an ICO; Minimal Aggregate Sentence Imposed

GC was charged with six firearms-related offences, namely ‘Possess unregistered firearm pistol’, contrary to s 36(1) Firearms Act 1996, ‘Not keep firearm safely not prohibited firearm/pistol’, contrary to s 39(1)(A) Firearms Act 1996, ‘Possess ammunition w/o holding licence/permit/authority’, contrary to s 65(3) Firearms Act 1996, ‘Acquire etc pistol subject to firearms prohibition order’, contrary to s 74(1) Firearms Act 1996, ‘Acquire etc ammunition subject to firearms prohibition order’, contrary to s 74(3) Firearms Act 1996 and ‘Firearm etc found at premises subject to prohibition order’, contrary to s 74(6) Firearms Act 1996. GC was serving an Intensive Corrections Order (ICO) for unrelated offences at the time of his arrest. He has a substantial criminal history including previous firearms charges.

Chris Cole entered negotiations with the Prosecution proposing a number of offences be withdrawn or placed on a Form 1, in exchange for a plea of guilty to the remaining offences. Ultimately, the Crown agreed to commit the matter for Sentence on just two offences, namely ‘Possess pistol subject to Firearms Prohibition Order’ and ‘Possess ammunition subject to Firearms Prohibition Order’. The sequence of ‘Not keep firearm safely’ was placed on a Form 1 and the remaining charges were withdrawn. GC was eligible for a 25% discount on Sentence for his early appropriate guilty plea (EAGP). 

Chris Cole briefed Counsel Mark Davies to appear at District Court Sentence. GC lives with severe cardiac illness and suffered a stroke not long before his arrest. A sentence bundle was prepared comprising of medical reports and documents, an affidavit, character references and other written materials in support of GC’s extenuating circumstances and mitigating factors.      

James Castillo appeared with Mark Davies of Counsel at District Court Sentence. The sentence bundle was tendered. Further tendered was an excerpt from the Bugmy Bar Book outlining the COVID-19 risks and impacts on prisoners. Counsel also prepared written submissions and made further oral submissions on GC’s behalf. GC was called to give evidence.

GC was then sentenced on the offences of ‘Possess pistol subject to Firearms Prohibition Order’, ‘Possess ammunition subject to Firearms Prohibition Order’ and ‘Not keep firearm safely’ (related offence). Ultimately, Her Honour found mitigating circumstances in GC’s favour and sentenced him to an aggregate sentence of 3 years with a non-parole period of 1 year and 8 months, backdated to include time already spent in custody.

This is an outstanding outcome for GC.

Sequence Placed on Form 1, No Conviction Recorded – Possess Prohibited Drug

AA was charged with one count of ‘Possess prohibited drug (Testosterone)’ and one count ‘Possess Prohibited drug (Methandienone)’, contrary to s 10(1) Drug Misuse and Trafficking Act 1985.

Chris Cole acted for AA in his matter.

A plea of guilty was entered to both sequences in the Local Court and the matter was adjourned for Sentence. Chris indicated to the Court that Representations would be sent to the Local Area Command concerning the Facts and possibly placing one of the sequences on a Form 1.

Chris successfully negotiated to have the second sequence placed on a Form 1. The matter proceeded to Sentence.

The Prosecution tendered written materials. Chris then tendered an Affidavit sworn by AA, character references and a drug screen result.    

Ultimately, Her Honour Sentenced AA to a Conditional Release Order (CRO) without conviction for a period of 12 months. The only condition of that order is that AA is to be of good behaviour for the period of that order.

AA is required to have a clear criminal record for his employment. This is a great result for AA.

Aggregate Sentence on Lengthy List of Indictable Charges – Attempt Murder; Break & Enter

PB was charged with offences relating to series of break and enter incidents. Namely, 2 counts of ‘Aggravated break and enter and commit serious indictable offence’, contrary to s 112(2) Crimes Act 1900, ‘Attempt to murder’, contrary to s 18(1)(a) Crimes Act 1900, ‘Specially aggravated break and enter and commit serious indictable offence’ (inflict grievous bodily harm), contrary to s 112(3) Crimes Act 1900, 4 counts of ‘Deal with property proceeds of crime < $100000’, contrary to s 193C(2) Crimes Act 1900, 3 counts of ‘Break and Enter dwelling-house or building commit serious indictable offence’ (destroy etc property), contrary to s 112(1)(a) Crimes Act 1900, ‘Aggravated enter dwelling with intent’ (knowing people there), contrary to s 111(2) Crimes Act 1900, ‘Enter dwelling with intent’, contrary to s 111(1) Crimes Act 1900 and ‘Larceny’, contrary to s 117 Crimes Act 1900. These are very serious charges resulting in lengthy terms of imprisonment if sentenced at the top end. PB has a substantial criminal history and had previously spent a number of years in custody for similar offences.

Chris Cole and James Castillo acted for PB in these matters, instructing David Carroll as Counsel.  

Chris Cole entered negotiations with the Prosecution to amend the Agreed Facts. A number of the charges were Certified for District Court and remaining sequences were withdrawn.

Following further negotiations, the matter proceeded to Committal. Pleas of guilty were entered on PB’s behalf to ‘Specially aggravated break and enter and commit serious indictable offence, namely larceny in circumstances of special aggravation, namely, did intentionally inflict grievous bodily harm’, a rolled up sequence (inclusive of 3 sequences), ‘Deal with property proceeds of crime less than $1,000,000.00’, and ‘Break and enter dwelling house commit serious indictable offence’. Further sequences ‘Enter dwelling house with intent to commit larceny’ and ‘Larceny’ were placed on a Form 1. The matter then proceeded to Sentence.

James Castillo appeared with David Carroll for PB’s Sentence at the District Court. The Crown Sentence bundle was tendered, and the Crown made Sentence submissions regarding PB’s risk of re-offending, future dangerousness and the protection of the community. David Carroll then made submissions on PB’s behalf. Mr Carroll’s submissions addressed the timing of plea and utilitarian discount on sentence, the objective seriousness of the offences, the subjective circumstances and mitigating features and special circumstances, referring to materials in the Defence Sentence bundle.   

His Honour considered both Crown and Defence submissions then proceeded to Judgment. Ultimately, His Honour sentenced PB to an aggregate sentence of 10 years 6 months imprisonment, with a non-parole period of 7 years.

This is a very pleasing result for PB considering the objective seriousness of these offences and his prior criminal history.

Successful Negotiations with Prosecution on Drug-Related Charges – CRO on Sentence

DS was charged with 11 drug-related and proceeds of crime offences, namely, ‘Deal with Proceeds of Crime < $1,000,000.00’, contrary to s 193(C) Crimes Act 1900, ‘Supply prohibited drug (Cannabis Leaf)’, contrary to s 25(1) Drug Misuse and Trafficking Act 1985,  3 counts of ‘Possess/attempt to possess prescribed restricted - (Tramadol, Methylphenidate, Diazepam)’, contrary to s 10(1) Drug Misuse and Trafficking Act 1985 and 6 Counts of ‘Possess prohibited drug (Cannabis Leaf, Alprazolam, Oxycodone, Tramadol, Methylamphetamine)’, contrary to s 16(1) Poisons and Therapeutics Goods Act 1966.

Chris Cole submitted representations to the Local Area Commander. He noted an early plea of guilty to ‘Possess prohibited drug (Cannabis Leaf)’ and sought to withdraw the remaining charges. He further noted no evidence of drug supply, receipts corresponding to the small amount of cash found on the premises and prescriptions in DS’ name for Tramadol and Oxycodone. The remaining restricted medications were prescribed to acquaintances of DS, all having recently stayed in her home.

Following negotiations, the Prosecution ultimately agreed to Chris Cole’s offer, withdrawing a number of charges in exchange for a plea of guilty to ‘Possess prohibited drug (Cannabis)’, placing one count of each ‘Possess prescribed restricted substance’ and ‘Possess prohibited drug’ on a Form 1.  

The matter proceeded to Sentence.

Chris tendered written material and made oral submissions on DS’ behalf. Ultimately, His Honour sentenced DS to a Conditional Release Order (with conviction) for period of 12 months, the only condition imposed was to be of good behaviour for the duration of that order.

This is a great result for DS, particularly noting the objective seriousness of the initial charges.

Numerous ‘Graffiti’ Related, ‘Good Suspected Stolen’, ‘Affray’ and ‘Hinder’ Charges Result in CCO and Fines.

RR had a number of ongoing matters before the Local Court including 23 charges relating to ‘Destroy / damage property’, contrary to s 195(1)(A) Crimes Act 1900, ‘Go onto or into or remain on or in running lines etc’, contrary to s 68j(1)(B) Passenger Transport (general) Regulation 2017 and ‘Goods suspected stolen in / on premises (not m/v)’, contrary to s 527c(1)(C) Crimes Act 1900. He also faced charges of ‘Affray’, contrary to s 93C(1) Crimes Act 1900 and ‘Fail to notify Authority of change in residential address within 14 days’, contrary to s 122(1)(b) Road Transport (driver Licensing) Regulation 2017. A further charge of ‘Hinder discovery evidence re: serious indictable offence’, contrary to s 315(1)(B) Crimes Act 1900, was brought against RR. Chris Cole acted for RR across these matters.

In regards to the ‘Destroy / damage property’, relating to graffiti offences, ‘Go onto or into or remain on or in running lines etc.’ and ‘Goods suspected stolen’ charges, Chris entered discussions with the Prosecution with the intent to negotiate a sensible plea deal. After discussions with the Prosecution were had, the Prosecution agreed to withdraw 11 of the sequences, in exchange for pleas of guilty to the offences where RR’s tag was identifiable and the ‘Goods suspected stolen’ charge. They also agreed to place the ‘Go onto … running lines etc’ charges on a Form 1.

A breach by RR of his Community Corrections Orders (CCO) was recorded whilst his matters were still before the Court.  

RR’s matters proceeded to Sentence. Chris Cole tendered various materials on RR’s behalf and made oral submissions. His Honour then Sentenced RR on each of the remaining charges. To the breach of CCO no action was taken. To the ‘Affray’ charge a CCO was imposed for the duration of 12 months and an $880.00 fine handed down. The Destroy / damage property’ offences resulted in a CCO for 12 months. RR also received a CCO for 12 months and fine of $880.00 on the ‘Hinder discovery evidence’ charge. In addition, His Honour made a Compensation Order of $5,816.00 payable to Sydney Trains.

This is a fantastic result for RR who was able to avoid any term of imprisonment or more restrictive community based orders.

Multiple Large Commercial Drug Supply and Weapons Charges Result in Minimal Custodial Sentence

GT was charged with multiple counts of ‘Supply large commercial quantity of prohibited drug’, contrary to s 25(2) Drug Misuse and Trafficking Act 1985, ‘Possess a prohibited weapon’ contrary to s 7(1) Weapons Prohibition Act 1998 and ‘Dealing with property suspected of being proceeds of crime’, contrary to s 193C(2) Crimes Act 1900. This is a very serious list of charges.

Chris Cole represented GT in these matters, briefing Counsel Scott Schaudin. GT was suffering from mental health and substance abuse issues at the time of offending.

The matter was listed for Sentence in the District Court, on which occasion Chris Cole and Scott Schaudin tendered a psychological report and character references on GT’s behalf. Counsel then made oral submissions in support of GT’s role, proposing that his role in the offence was lower in objective seriousness than that of the co-accused, and that the material before Her Honour reflects better than good prospects of rehabilitation.

Pleas of guilty were maintained to the charges of ‘Supply large commercial quantity of prohibited drug’, contrary to s 25(2) Drug Misuse and Trafficking Act 1985 and ‘Possess a prohibited weapon’ contrary to s 7(1) Weapons Prohibition Act 1998. The remaining offences were placed on a Form 1.

Ultimately, Her Honour Sentenced GT to an aggregate Sentence is 5 years imprisonment, with a non-parole period of 3 years. Taking into account time already served, GT will be eligible to be released on parole this year.